Scott Schneider, who represents the Kansas Restaurant and Hospitality Association, tells lawmakers during a hearing Tuesday that governments should understand they have to compensate businesses when wielding their policing powers. (Screen capture of Kansas Legislature YouTube by Kansas Reflector)
TOPEKA — Wichita restaurant owner John Arnold says it is difficult to avoid feeling vilified by government restrictions placed on businesses in the interest of public health.
The pandemic treated his industry differently, Arnold explained to lawmakers during a hearing Tuesday in the House. Restaurants were forced to close altogether as COVID-19 first crept across the state, and only allowed to reopen with limited capacity.
The owner of Jax Restaurant and Bar, Deano’s Grill and Tapworks, Stearman Airfield Bar and Grill, and Oak and Pie Pizza had to figure out how to unload expired beer without contaminating the wastewater system. Some of his employees refused to return to work. To pay his property tax bill, he took out a loan that he will be paying on for years.
And he lost his head chef to the deadly virus.
“We not only were down financially, we took the human toll, which was just just devastating to us,” Arnold said.
He joined others from the restaurant industry in supporting House Bill 2142, which would punish counties that imposed health orders that limited business activities. The counties would have to reimburse businesses for 100% of their property tax bill, including property taxes paid to the state and other taxing entities, for a proportionate amount of business lost.
The bill appears to be a conversation starter, but perhaps not the solution, for lawmakers eager to help restaurants recover from the pandemic’s severe financial toll. County representatives warned they would have to make steep cuts to law enforcement budgets if forced to repay an estimated $500 million in property tax refunds across the state. The bill only applies to county-imposed restrictions, absolving Gov. Laura Kelly of the responsibility for losses caused by a statewide shutdown at the start of the pandemic.
There also are lingering questions about who would benefit from the bill when any business could apply for relief and few restaurants own their building.
“It looks like the property tax money would not only be going back to those developers, but out-of-state developers who pay those property taxes,” said Rep. Jerry Stogsdill, D-Prairie Village.
Scott Schneider, who represents the Kansas Restaurant and Hospitality Association, said the decision to limit businesses would become the subject of litigation based on protections afforded in the 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The amendment says private property can’t be taken for public use without just compensation, but there are diverging opinions about whether a health order can be construed as a “taking.”
Schneider said restaurants in Kansas lost $325 million in revenue by being closed for one month, and one-sixth of restaurants nationwide are expected to close permanently as a result of the pandemic.
“We’re not here arguing whether or not the county or the state has policing powers,” Schneider said. “We think they do they have legitimate policing powers. But if they’re going to exercise them, there needs to be a way to understand that compensation has to be given.”
Kevin Timmons, who owns Nick and Jake’s restaurants in the Kansas City area, said lockdowns and restrictions forced restaurants to make previously unthinkable decisions.
“Do we pay property taxes, or do we pay payroll? Do we pay our property taxes or our vendors?” Timmons said. “Restaurants along with others are not fighting for pre-pandemic profits. Rather, we are fighting for the survival for our business.”
Jay Hall, representing the Kansas Association of Counties, said it wasn’t fair to impose the financial burden on governing bodies that also face difficult choices. In Johnson County alone, Hall said, the bill would bring a $177 million cost to the county.
“If that money comes out of the general fund, some hard choices are going to have to be made at the county level — not just on personnel type things, but also on: Are we going to spend money on clearing the streets this winter, or are we going to spend money on maintaining the streets in the spring? Are we going to put more money into sheriff’s patrols or are we going to spend that money in the jails?” Hall said.
Sedgwick County Commissioner Pete Meitzner said the county would have to raise taxes and eliminate positions for 40 sheriff’s officers if forced to pay the retroactive property tax rebate.
Trey Cocking, of the Kansas League of Municipalities, told lawmakers the bill was an attempt to defund the police — a reference to police reforms proposed by Black Lives Matter and a phrase widely opposed by Republicans.
Cocking also said the hospitality industry in South Dakota suffered more losses than in Kansas, even though there were no government-imposed restrictions in South Dakota.
“At the end of the day, it is not the government that is making these decisions,” Cocking said. “It is people voting with their footsteps. And when they don’t feel safe, they’re not going to the restaurants. Until we can make people safe, restaurants are not going to be full. It’s not about a government mandate. It’s about getting to a point of safety.”
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.