KU researchers suspect two federal surveys undercount people with disabilities

Analysis says survey shortcomings lead to mismatched health care services

By: - October 4, 2022 10:27 am
New research published by the University of Kansas suggests two prominent federal surveys undercount the number of U.S. residents with disabilities and results in misdirection of health care resources. (Tim Carpenter/Kansas Reflector)

New research published by the University of Kansas suggests two prominent federal surveys undercount the number of U.S. residents with disabilities and results in misdirection of health care resources. (Tim Carpenter/Kansas Reflector)

TOPEKA — Researchers at the University of Kansas say their national survey of individuals’ health demonstrated two widely used federal assessments relied upon to distribute public assistance missed swaths of people with mental health disabilities and chronic conditions.

Findings in the National Survey on Health and Disability, known as the NSHD, performed by KU were compared with responses to disability questions in the American Community Survey, referred to as the ACS-6, and the Washington Group Short Set, or the WG-SS.

The new research reported in the journal Health Affairs said ACS-6 failed to identify 20% and WG-SS failed to pinpoint 43% of respondents with a disability who self-reported a psychiatric disability or chronic health condition on the NSHD.

“We were able to categorize how people self-identify and categorize their own disability and how those results compared with the other commonly used measures,” said Jean Hall, director of KU’s Institute for Health and Disability Policy Studies in the Life Span Institute.

The gaps suggested health care resources allotted for certain types of disability were not consistent with need, researchers said.

ACS-6, in particular, is broadly used in the United States by federal and state agencies. WG-SS is used more internationally, but regularly deployed in this country.

KU researchers said questions in the ACS-6 and WG-SS were insufficiently comprehensive. NSHD included disability questions in the ACS-6 and WG-SS, but NSHD asked individuals if they identified as having any physical or mental condition, impairment or disability influencing daily activities or required use of special equipment or devices. NSHD also requested respondents classify their own disability.

“We argue that you’re identifying people as disabled, but not categorizing them correctly with the type of disabilities they report, and because of that probably not getting people the supports and services they need,” Hall said.

This study published in Health Affairs was written by Hall; Noelle Kurth and Kelsey Goddard, research associates at the Life Span Institute; and Catherine Ipsen and Andrew Myers of the University of Montana.

The Affordable Care Act mandated federal health surveys collect data to identify people with disabilities to better understand prevalence of these conditions and to address health disparities. Availability of precise numbers could help improve policy, address risk, understand disability prevalence and reduce adverse outcomes.

The COVID-19 pandemic complicated statistical analysis of disability due to a rise in the number of people with mental health challenges and of people experiencing complications from long COVID-19. Standard ACS-6 and WG-SS measures, KU researchers said, missed people with these conditions in the greatest numbers, further leading to undercounting.

KU researchers said ACS-6 and WG-SS surveys could be improved by adding questions about how the mental or physical condition, impairment or disability influenced daily activities and required use of equipment or technology.

Also, the surveys could delve into the range of conditions experienced by respondents as well as the age of onset and duration of the condition.

“People with disabilities are the best at defining their own conditions,” said Kurth, of the Life Span Institute at KU. “There is a rising tide of disability pride in the U.S. in the last 10 years as well, so obtaining the most accurate counts of disability is something worth talking about.”

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

Tim Carpenter
Tim Carpenter

Tim Carpenter has reported on Kansas for 35 years. He covered the Capitol for 16 years at the Topeka Capital-Journal and previously worked for the Lawrence Journal-World and United Press International. He has been recognized for investigative reporting on Kansas government and politics. He won the Kansas Press Association's Victor Murdock Award six times. The William Allen White Foundation honored him four times with its Burton Marvin News Enterprise Award. The Kansas City Press Club twice presented him its Journalist of the Year Award and more recently its Lifetime Achievement Award. He earned an agriculture degree at Kansas State University and grew up on a small dairy and beef cattle farm in Missouri. He is an amateur woodworker and drives Studebaker cars.

MORE FROM AUTHOR